正文 Markdown
THIS HARVARD STUDY JUST PUT AN LLM AHEAD OF ER DOCTORS Beth Israel gave o1 and real doctors the same 76 ER triage cases. o1: 67%. Doctors: 50-55%. We're in this weird moment where the AI outperforms the doctor but the doctor is still legally required to ignore it. The study itself says there's no accountability framework. Which means a hospital could have a tool that saves more lives and their lawyers would tell them not to use it. An AI that's right 67% of the time gets called dangerous. A doctor that's right 55% of the time gets called board certified. Whoever figures out how to use AI in healthcare and deal with the liability problem is sitting on a generational company.