原文整理页

探讨 OpenAI 与 Anthropic 对 AI 研究生态的贡献差异,指出 OpenAI 虽被戏称为“ClosedAI”,但实际贡献远超 Anthropic

来源作者:Peter Steinberger 🦞 (@steipete)原始来源:https://x.com/steipete/status/2065003868459811240

中文导读

探讨 OpenAI 与 Anthropic 对 AI 研究生态的贡献差异,指出 OpenAI 虽被戏称为“ClosedAI”,但实际贡献远超 Anthropic。

正文 Markdown

If you really think about it, despite being mocked as “ClosedAI,” OpenAI has contributed enormously to the field: GPT, GPT-2, GPT-3, CLIP, the ChatGPT paper, the GPT-4 Technical Report, the Sora technical blog, and even open-sourced Codex. Anthropic, meanwhile, has contributed far less to the public research ecosystem while increasingly promoting fear-based narratives and restricting access through heavy gatekeeping. The world I least want to live in is one where the future of AI is controlled by companies that prioritize secrecy, gated access, and centralized control over openness, reproducibility, and scientific progress.